Since starting work on this post, I've discussed some of the issues I have with the new Blogger interface in a segment of my signature political blog here. Ironically, one of my chief complaints, which has to do with Blogger's New Coke approach, doesn't apply to this blog; I do have a link for reverting back to Blogger Classic, although only temporarily, for this blog. I don't know why the older blog doesn't have the link. Many of my issues deal with toggling the compose and html mode. In my daily political "miscellany" post, I'll often include a number of embedded objects, primarily video clips. So typically I'll copy and paste bits of html code from other sources into html mode. Now the classic mode of html did a beautiful job of maintaining separation of html code and preserving text lines between modes, so, for example, I could effectively insert a couple of lines between a video and the next (existing) section header while inside html mode and those blank lines would carry over to compose mode. There were various functional reasons for inserting blank lines in html mode, including it is an easier way to avoid carryover formatting while in compose mode, e.g., from headline format to normal text format. I could more easily adjust the post format without fiddling with formats in compose mode.
It also makes it easier to find and replace html code. An example is that I've sometimes thought I had copied a video's embedded code into clipboard for insertion (replacing the prior video's code) but the copy failed, and I ended up duplicating the video in the post, which I discovered after publishing the post. Under the classic html mode, it was fairly easy to locate the duplicated video code and replace it for updating the post.
Under the new html format, html code becomes more spaghetti-like in a collapsed format and you need to parse the html ball to make your changes. Spacing in draft mode doesn't map to the compose mode. For instance, my miscellany posts usually include a quote for the day and a daily older music video "interlude" at the bottom. But if the first thing I do after adding a quote is to add my music video of the day, I can separate the quote and video segments by 50 lines in html mode, but if I flip back to display mode, the music video section appears immediately after quote and I have to fuss with compose mode settings to insert intervening post segments. It adds to the busy work of writing and publishing a mixed-mode post. (It isn't as much of an issue in drafting a primarily text post like this one.)
One related aspect I didn't discuss earlier is that Blogger Classic would also provide a way of displaying an embedded video (especially Youtube clips). Now you simply see a gray blob. The (earlier) WYSIWYG compose display didn't work for all but most of the clips I would embed. There is a preview post mode (under both versions) which works to the same desired end. Occasionally I'll run into a clip where I can't see if it works until the post is actually posted. But obviously it was easier for me to verify the clip in a WYSIWYG compose view than to preview or publish the post.
There are other minor points, probably idiosyncratic to my blogging activity. One is the fact that there used to be a checkbox in the blog stats page where you could set a blocking cookie so your own pageviews wouldn't inflate statistics. (Technically, I would prefer that to be true by default without having to constantly check if the cookie is still there.) I'll often tweak a published post for various issues like typos or wording, and maybe up to a half-dozen edits (rare, but it happens) would significantly bias my reader stats. (Some of my blogs have 100 or more pageview posts, but say I probably average less than a dozen on my daily blog;) I have an informal preference to see at least double-digits, but "real" double-digits. I have probably dozens that have capped at 9, but I don't want to cheat just by viewing each post in question. So the point is, if there is a block cookie option in the new Blogger I haven't found it yet. I recall recently I had a delayed browser launch of my published post, and the browser eventually responded with 3 or 4 windows; those all factored into the post statistics.
Finally, there are a number of feature inconsistencies, not that difficult but annoying and not necessarily obvious. An example to make the point: I'll often embed a political cartoon in my miscellany daily post and use the caption function to attribute the artist and the source. I normally had to resize the embedded image under the old format and actually like the initial size under new functionality; if I had to tweak the size, the controls are obvious, while the old controls were more of a toggle switch approach. However, somehow I didn't recognize the caption option at first and ended up manually inserting a caption line in a line following the image the first few times I inserted images and eventually discovered the caption option by playing around with the interface. Maybe the interface was more natural to other people.
